Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| meetings:2025-03-16 [2025/03/23 23:50] – [Agenda Item 5] rsimoes | meetings:2025-03-16 [2025/03/24 00:25] (current) – [Agenda Item 3] paulwuersig | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| (Cory) Consider appealing some of Gabe's no-shows | (Cory) Consider appealing some of Gabe's no-shows | ||
| + | Kate: It seems at least some of the no-shows were partial, or labor instructions for Gabriel were unclear. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Joy: The gross no-shows were high enough that even if the no-shows were successfully appeared, the amount over would still be enough to determine that the eviction hold-off agreement was violated. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CQ (to Gabriel): Are there particular no-shows you wish to contest? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gabriel: There were some that conflicted with job transition/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | CQ: What is the list of no-shows? | ||
| + | |||
| + | (list is read, 11 total) | ||
| + | |||
| + | PoI: This has been ongoing for a very long time with no improvement (since before coop labor was brought back from COVID lockdown procedures). I don’t believe he has taken his labor responsibilities seriously even after the member review. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CQ: Are enough hours being contested to render the agreement no longer violated? | ||
| + | |||
| + | A: Five total, possibly six | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Consensus check to forgive six no-show: 8 in favor, 6 against (passes)** | ||
| + | |||
| + | CQ (to Gabe): are you able to communicate with the labor czar now? | ||
| + | |||
| + | A: Yes, it is much easier now than before. | ||
| + | |||
| + | PoI: Communication of all kinds have been attempted in the past: door notes, text messages, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CQ (to Joy): What about on your end? | ||
| + | |||
| + | A: He responds to emails now, though it took reaching this point. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 84: | ||
| + | CQ: At what point in the procedure are we? What sort of vote is required? | ||
| + | |||
| + | A: A determination that an eviction hold-off agreement was violated requires a simple majority, no secret or otherwise-written ballots necessary (though the meeting attendees can request paper ballots to do so anyway). | ||
| + | |||
| + | PoI: He seems to be improving, and if we give him a chance, then hopefully it will continue. I don’t think I’ll be as forgiving next time around. | ||
| + | |||
| + | PoI: I think you’re all doing a great job. It is frustrating but also difficult to make a decision like this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CQ: Can we vote? | ||
| + | |||
| + | PoI: Because we forgave the hours, the only term that was possibly broken was the requirements for communication. | ||
| + | Vote taken: 5 in favor, 6 against. The proposal does not pass. | ||
| ===== Agenda Item 5 ===== | ===== Agenda Item 5 ===== | ||